How Faith Deconstruction Actually Works on the Page (Not in Essays)
If your “belief crisis” reads like a Twitter thread in chapter form, this is for you.
Deconstruction isn’t an essay—it’s a series of losses and trades
In essays, deconstruction looks clean: a list of arguments, a tidy timeline, a crisp conclusion. On the page? It’s messy. It’s a character realizing that a belief they relied on is load-bearing… and then watching it crack while they’re still standing under it.
The big craft translation is this: beliefs don’t change because the character “figures it out.” Beliefs change because the character pays for them—socially, emotionally, morally—and eventually can’t afford the old version anymore.
The engine: cognitive dissonance under pressure
Psychologists call it cognitive dissonance: the discomfort we feel when our actions, experiences, and beliefs don’t match—then the scramble to reduce that discomfort. Fiction writers call it: plot.
Contradiction moments (the “this shouldn’t be possible” scene)
You need at least one scene that creates a clean, undeniable mismatch between what the character believes and what the character experiences. Not a debate. Not a lecture. A moment that lands in the body.
- A prayer “works” in the wrong way.
- A miracle shows up… but it’s ugly, not comforting.
- A trusted authority does something that makes the character’s worldview feel naïve.
- The universe stays silent at the exact moment silence becomes unacceptable.
In my own Spirit Saga work, I lean on that first collision: the character wakes into a reality that doesn’t fit their assumptions, and the story forces them to make decisions before they feel ready. (No spoilers—just the vibe.)
Cost moments (belief must charge interest)
A belief system that costs nothing is décor. A belief system that costs something is story fuel. If you want authentic deconstruction, write the invoice.
- What does staying loyal to the old belief cost them today?
- What does questioning it cost them today?
- Who punishes them either way?
The page-level toolkit (how to write it without preaching)
1) Externalize the question (make it physical/social)
Instead of “I no longer believe X,” give us: “If I do X, someone gets hurt.” Put the belief in a situation where it has to operate like a tool. If it fails, it fails publicly.
Faith deconstruction often gets framed as purely intellectual, but real-world accounts describe it as emotional, identity-shaking, and socially disruptive too. Use that.
2) Turn doctrine into decisions
Readers don’t bond with a thesis. They bond with a choice. Translate abstract belief into a repeated decision pattern:
- Old belief: “Suffering is always purposeful.”
- Decision pattern: They stop intervening… even when they could.
- Crack: The “purpose” starts looking like an excuse.
- New belief: “Meaning isn’t guaranteed; it’s constructed.”
3) Use “micro-betrayals” instead of monologues
Deconstruction on the page is rarely one dramatic betrayal. It’s a chain of tiny ones: the character prays less, confesses less, avoids certain people, stops using certain words, lies to keep the peace, then suddenly realizes they’ve been living a different faith for months.
4) Make community a character
Most belief systems are social ecosystems. That means your character isn’t just questioning an idea—they’re risking a place in a tribe.
- Who becomes “unsafe” to talk to?
- Who gets weirdly sweet (because they’re scared)?
- Who gets angry (because your character’s questions threaten their stability)?
5) Let silence do some of the work
When characters are losing certainty, they often lose language first. Use gaps: unfinished prayers, interrupted rituals, conversations where the character can’t find the old words anymore. Readers will feel the absence like a missing tooth.
Deconstruction has outcomes—pick one (and foreshadow it)
“Deconstruction” isn’t automatically “deconversion.” Sometimes it ends in reconstruction—a re-formed, re-chosen faith. Sometimes it ends in disbelief. Sometimes it ends in a quiet, private spirituality with zero institutional attachment.
Your job is to choose an outcome that fits the character’s emotional need, then foreshadow it with the kinds of costs they’re willing (or unwilling) to pay.
A quick scene recipe you can steal today
- Trigger: One contradiction moment the character can’t explain away.
- Reflex: They double down publicly (to keep status / safety).
- Private crack: A small “micro-betrayal” (they don’t do the ritual / they avoid the authority).
- Cost: Community pressure or moral consequence lands.
- Trade: They choose a new decision pattern that redefines who they are.
If you can do that three times across a book—each time raising the stakes—you’ll have a deconstruction arc that feels lived-in, not lectured.
Further reading (for the curious)
CTA
If you like stories where belief has consequences (and consequences have teeth), you’ll probably enjoy the Spirit Saga. Start here: /the-observer/
Or, if you want a fun craft-adjacent rabbit hole: take the Spirit Type Test and then tell me whether you got “Observer,” “Trickster,” or “Demon.”
Want craft posts like this in your inbox (no spam, no sermons)? Join the newsletter.
Share this:
Discover more from Brian Thompson Writes
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.